Guess what? There are no other Governor Councillors on this list of Fish contributions except for Carole Fiola? And you know what ....Carole Fiola is not even in the Fishes' backyard or even district for that matter! So why the big interest in justices / parole matters in the Southeastern Corridor of Massachusetts?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.efs.cpf.state.ma.us/SearchItemResults.aspx This Post will not format properly in this comment dialogue format!!! Records 1 through 50 of 152 total records ($60,625.00) WHERE Zip = '02119' AND Contributor Name Includes 'fish' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Notice....Fish's contributions are reported differently as almost hiding his business idenity.
Yet, Governor's Councillor Fiola's treasurer is consistent with Hult and Marchione business identity.
4/28/2008 CHECK Fish, Edward A. 536 Granite Street Braintree, MA 02184 Owner Edward A. Fish Associates $200.00 4/28/2008 CHECK Hult, Catherine Requested Hanover, MA 02339 VP Affordable Housing Peobody Properties $200.00 4/28/2008 CHECK Marchione, Frank 31 Semple Village Road Attleboro, MA 02703 Business Owner Honeydew Donuts $200.00 11/24/2008 CHECK Fish, Edward 536 Granite Street Braintree, MA 02184 Owner Suffolk Construction $200.00 11/24/2008 CHECK Hult, Catherine Requested Hanover, MA 02339 VP Affordable Housing Peobody Properties $200.00 11/24/2008 CHECK Marchione, Frank 31 Semple Village Road Attleboro, MA 02703 Developer Self Employed $200.00 5/1/2007 CHECK Fish, Edward 536 Granite Street Braintree, MA 02184 Owner Peobody Properties $500.00 5/1/2007 CHECK Marchione, Frank 31 Semple Attleboro, MA 02703 Business Owner Honeydew Donuts $200.00
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yes Fall Riverites! ....
This can happen here too!
So listen to the rules carefully before you decide to also take your ball home and not play with these boys!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Owners sue Edward A. Fish companies
By Christine McConville
Saturday, February 21, 2009
It was billed as high-end luxury living near the entrance of the former Charlestown Navy Yard.
But eight years after the Nautica was completed, some of its residents are suing the companies that built and then managed the site.
In a 26-count lawsuit filed in late December, the trustees of the Nautica Leasehold Condominium Trust have accused several of real estate developer Edward A. Fishs companies of negligence, breach of contract and unfair business practices.
They are seeking at least $3 million in damages.
Fishs lawyers have disptued many of the trustees claims, and have said that because more than seven years have passed since the projects completion, statutes of limitation may bar some or all of the claims.
The $51 million, 117-unit project was developed by Fishs Braintree-based company. He hired Suffolk Construction Co. - a company he owned at the time, along with his son, John - to build the property in 2000.
After it was completed, another Fish company - Peabody Properties Inc. - was hired to manage the development.
According to the lawsuit, the people who bought condominiums at Nautica were promised that all materials and equipment used in the construction would be new, of first-class quality and free from substantial faults and defects.
In their 2008 complaint, the condominium trustees say the building, which borders Chelsea Street and Constitution Way, was defectively built and contains latent defects. According to the complaint, many of the buildings balconies, dormers and walls are defective. The structural framing, insulation and roofing systems also came with problems, the complaint states.
Peabody Properties concealed the extent of the defects, telling the buildings trustees that it was built in accordance with approved plans and specifications, the complaint states.
The trustees say that Peabody failed to advise the trustees to hire an independent consultant to assess the extent of the damages, and acted in an unfair and deceptive manner.
The complaint also accuses Edward A. Fishs other companies of making false representations and warranties as to the quality of the work performed and materials used and failing to inspect and correct defects in the construction.
After the complaint was filed in Suffolk Superior Court, attorneys for Edward A. Fish and Suffolk Construction disputed the charges.
Last month, the dispute moved to Suffolk Superior Courts Business Litigation Session, where it is currently pending.
People on both sides of the dispute either declined to comment or could not be reached for comment.
cmcconville@bostonherald.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
23 February, 2009 23:29
No comments:
Post a Comment